Legal Opinions of the Attorney General - Monthly Opinion Report

The Attorney General’s Opinion Unit is responsible for researching and drafting the formal opinions of the Attorney General. This Monthly Opinion Report lists all of the questions that are currently under consideration for formal opinions.

The Attorney General welcomes and solicits the views of all interested persons concerning the issues raised in any question submitted for an opinion. Views should be in writing and directed to the attorney assigned to prepare the opinion. Please follow the instructions under How to Submit Views on Assigned Opinion Requests in the right side bar menu. All views submitted before publication will be considered, but early submissions are greatly preferred. All submissions will be treated as public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.

The Attorney General provides opinions under Government Code section 12519 only to certain public officials. Please see our FAQs page for more information about how to request an opinion.


New Questions Assigned in

Opinion No. Question(s) Presented Requested by Assigned To
26-903

1. Is a custodial deputy sheriff as described under Penal Code section 830.1(c), who is employed to perform duties exclusively or initially relating to custodial assignments, a “peace officer” while away from the county’s detention facilities and appearing at community service events, participating as a member of the Sheriff's Honor Guard, or conducting recruitment background checks or internal affairs investigations?

2. If that custodial deputy sheriff is a “peace officer,” are they allowed to open carry a department authorized firearm while away from the county’s detention facilities and appearing at community service events, participating as a member of the Sheriff's Honor Guard, or conducting recruitment background checks or internal affairs investigations?

Stanislaus Sheriff-Coroner Jeff Dirkse McCarroll
10/13/2026
26-904

Under the common law, does a director of a special district, who also serves as a board member of an independent non-profit corporation, have a disqualifying conflict of interest in decisions to make a grant to the non-profit corporation in furtherance of the special district’s mission and purpose where there are express statutory exemptions for such transfers under the Political Reform Act and Government Code section 1090?

Senator Akilah Weber Pierson Duncan Lee
10/16/2026

Opinions Issued or Concluded in

Opinion No. Question(s) Presented Conclusion(s) Issued
26-901

DANIEL BOOKMAN and CONNER EVERTS seek to file a lawsuit in state court against GLORIA D. GRAY to remove her from public office on the Board of Directors of the West Basin Municipal Water District (West Basin). Filing the lawsuit requires Attorney General permission, known as “leave to sue in quo warranto.” In seeking permission, the applicants argue that Gray forfeited her West Basin office under state law, Government Code section 1099, when she became a member of the Inglewood City Council. The City of Inglewood falls within West Basin’s service area. According to the applicants, section 1099 prohibits holding office on both the West Basin Board and the Inglewood City Council because their interrelated powers create the potential for divided loyalties. Holding two incompatible offices results in forfeiture of the first-held office to safeguard loyalty to the office most recently chosen.

The proposed lawsuit meets all three of the Attorney General’s criteria to grant leave to sue: it is correctly brought through the quo warranto process, it raises a substantial legal issue warranting judicial resolution, and such resolution would serve the public interest. Consequently, we GRANT leave to sue.

10/07/2026
26-201

If a private nonprofit organization accepts and uses public funds to purchase materials for use on a construction project, is the organization obliged to pay prevailing wages to the workers that it hires onto the same project if the workers are paid using other, non-public funds?

Yes, as a general rule, when a private nonprofit organization accepts and uses public funds to purchase materials for use on a construction project, the organization is obliged to pay prevailing wages to the workers that it hires onto that same project.

10/13/2026

Pending Matters as of

Opinion Requests

Opinion No. Question(s) Presented Assigned To
26-904 Under the common law, does a director of a special district, who also serves as a board member of an independent non-profit corporation, have a disqualifying conflict of interest in decisions to make a grant to the non-profit corporation in furtherance of the special district’s mission and purpose where there are express statutory exemptions for such transfers under the Political Reform Act and Government Code section 1090?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-904 is issued
Duncan Lee
26-903 (1) Is a custodial deputy sheriff of the County of Stanislaus as described under Penal Code section 830.1(c), who is employed to perform duties exclusively or initially relating to custodial assignments, a “peace officer” while away from the county’s detention facilities and appearing at community service events, participating as a member of the Sheriff's Honor Guard, or conducting recruitment background checks or internal affairs investigations? (2) If that custodial deputy sheriff is a “peace officer,” are they allowed to open carry a department authorized firearm while away from the county’s detention facilities and appearing at community service events, participating as a member of the Sheriff's Honor Guard, or conducting recruitment background checks or internal affairs investigations?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-903 is issued
McCarroll
26-801 (1) Does the Penal Code section 919(b) requirement that a grand jury “inquire into the condition and management of the public prisons within the county” apply to state prisons and fire camps operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation? (2) If the answer to Question 1 is yes, may grand juries conduct a full investigation and release reports regarding those entities after a full investigation; and who would be required to respond to such reports? (3) Is a local juvenile detention facility used for the confinement of both adults and minors a “public prison” subject to the Penal Code section 919(b) inquiry requirement?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-801 is issued
Bidart
26-602 To serve as a Trustee for Reclamation District No. 1000, does a candidate need to be (1) a landowner in the District per Water Code § 50014, (2) a resident in the District per Water Code § 50780.12, or (3) both a landowner and a resident in the District?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-602 is issued
Thomas
26-102 Can Local Emergency Medical Services Authorities (“LEMSAs”), such as the Riverside County Emergency Medical Services Agency, share the California state criminal offender record information of employees of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”) with CAL FIRE?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-102 is issued
Bidart
26-101 (1) Under state law, is the Beaumont Cherry Valley Recreation and Park District required to seek permission from the City of Beaumont via permits or licenses before holding special events on District property that lies within the City? (2) Under state law, may the District contract with Riverside County to provide review services for compliance with the California Building Code and California Fire Code for special events on District property that lies within the City? (3) Under state law, may the District contract with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department or a privately licensed and bonded security services company to provide security services at special events on District property that lies within the City?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-101 is issued
McCarroll
25-1202 Does the Marina Village property within Mission Bay Park, which is owned by the City of San Diego, qualify as exempted surplus land under the Surplus Land Act?
Notify me when Opinion No. 25-1202 is issued
Duncan Lee
25-1102 Under the Housing Crisis Act of 2019: (1) What statute of limitations applies to an action brought to enforce Government Code section 66300(b)(1) when filed by a party other than the Attorney General or the Department of Housing and Community Development? (2) Does a referendum that rejects a general plan amendment or specific plan for housing development adopted by the legislative body of a city or county—where that amendment or plan would have increased the “intensity of land use” as defined in section 66300(b)(1)(A), or permitted housing on land where it would otherwise not be allowed—constitute either a “moratorium or similar restriction or limitation on housing development” in violation of section 66300(b)(1)(B)(i); or a change in the “general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation, or zoning” to a less intensive use, or a reduction in land use intensity, in violation of subdivision (b)(1)(A)? (3) If a city or county concludes that a voter-approved referendum results in an effect prohibited by section 66300, does the city or county have the authority under section 66300(b)(2) to deem the referendum void and unenforceable on its own, or must it first obtain a judicial determination before it can disregard the referendum?
Notify me when Opinion No. 25-1102 is issued
Sorenson
25-801 For purposes of the voter-approval requirements of Proposition 218, what is the proper definition of the term "electorate" as it relates to a special tax to be imposed only on the unincorporated region of a county?
Notify me when Opinion No. 25-801 is issued
Thomas
24-902 Are claw machines illegal gambling devices under the Penal Code?
Notify me when Opinion No. 24-902 is issued
Kentfield

Quo Warranto Matters

Opinion No. Question(s) Presented Assigned To
26-902 May Helen Diaz-Molina, Tony Sandoval, and Pompeyo Tabarez, Jr. serve as members of both the Heber Public Utility District Board of Directors and the Heber Elementary School District Board of Trustees?
Notify me when Opinion No. 26-902 is issued
Kupfer
25-901 Has Jason Lee Johnson satisfied the residency requirements to serve on the Stockton City Council?
Notify me when Opinion No. 95-901 is issued
McCarroll