State of California Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
Translate Website | Traducir Sitio Web
Kamala D. Harris ~ Attorney General
Translate Website | Traducir Sitio Web
Opinions published in 2014
| Opinion | Question | Conclusion | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13-1103 |
1. Was Dr. Yxstian Gutierrez unlawfully appointed to serve out the term of the incumbent city council member for Moreno Valley’s “District Four,” who resigned from office before his term expired, because Dr. Gutierrez did not reside in District Four as that district was constituted when the incumbent was elected? 2. Was Dr. Yxstian Gutierrez unlawfully appointed to the Moreno Valley City Council because the council failed to comply with the open-meeting and notice provisions of the Brown Act? |
Leave to sue in quo warranto is GRANTED to determine whether Dr. Yxstian Gutierrez satisfies the residency requirements for holding the office of Moreno Valley City Council member from District Four. We make no determination regarding Relators’ Brown Act claims as it is not necessary for us to do so in order to reach a decision on the present application. | 03/21/2014 |
| 13-902 | Proposed relator SAUGUS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT has requested leave to sue proposed defendant STEPHEN WINKLER in quo warranto to remove him from the public office of School District Trustee on the ground that he does not reside in the District as required by law. | Leave to sue is GRANTED to determine whether proposed defendant STEPHEN WINKLER meets the legal residency requirements for holding the public office of School District Trustee. | 02/11/2014 |
| 12-1101 | Does continuous videotaping surveillance of truck drivers during their on-the-job driving constitute a misdemeanor under Labor Code section 1051 where the video file is inspected by a third party and used as a basis for discipline by the driver’s employer? | Continuous videotaping surveillance of truck drivers during their on-the-job driving does not constitute a misdemeanor under Labor Code section 1051 where the video file is inspected by a third party and used as a basis for discipline by the driver’s employer, provided that the third party is an agent of the driver’s employer who is videotaping and inspecting the file for the sole benefit of the driver’s employer, and that the file is furnished only to the driver’s employer. | 02/13/2014 |
California Registered Sex Offender Database
Megan's Law information is also available in these languages:
This Google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only.
The Office of the Attorney General is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.
Please consult with a translator for accuracy if you are relying on the translation or are using this site for official business.
If you have any questions please contact:Bilingual Services Program at (916) 324-5482
A copy of this disclaimer can also be found on our Disclaimer page.
Close this box or use the [ X ]
